Like Jumpman16 said in the other thread that people need to specify what percent they'd be happy with for something to become Uber. I figured it'd be fastest and easiest to collect that data in a(nother) poll.
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
What % Majority do you feel would be enough to change a Suspect's Tier?
- Thread starter MythTrainerInfinity
- Start date
- Status
Voted 2/3 Supermajority, but this has the same problem as the other one in that it does not allow for serial Uber votes. 2 simple majorities or 1 supermajority is my opinion.
Well then you still have the issue where Garchomp was initially voted Uber with a 72.22% vote and now we're considering revising that after the most recent vote... Its hard to say... but I do like your idea SDS.
Yeah, but the current vote is considering the inclusion of Latias and Scizor. Now, I highly suspect that with Latios and Skymin removed the vote is going to swung WAY more towards Uber, but yeah.
Cathy
Banned deucer.
I don't like this thread because it presents the question wrongly and with confusing options. "Percent to change tiers" isn't the same thing as "percent to declare uber", which is what we are talking about in the other thread. The former (what this thread is about) places value on the status quo, and the latter doesn't. If you intended this thread as a supplement to mine, the question is very problematic. (Additionally, the poll shouldn't be private.)
In addition to those problems, I would first like to establish that the simple majority is not widely supported. There's no reason we need to decide on a particular ratio at this point, and also no reason to exclude other options. My formulation of the issues is better.
In addition to those problems, I would first like to establish that the simple majority is not widely supported. There's no reason we need to decide on a particular ratio at this point, and also no reason to exclude other options. My formulation of the issues is better.
The purpose of this thread is to merely gather data to help move along some things.
Since I refer to the other thread I would assume people would have an idea about what I'm talking about. Especially since this is the Policy Review Forum.
If you'd like me to elaborate on the choices and such I will though.
If you'd like me to elaborate on the choices and such I will though.
- Status