Firstly, lord
kirsche , You LOVE to purposely write all the bad stuff as tl;dr instead of an explained tl;dr or even a fair tl;dr, don't you? Oh, sorry, you did it on purpose. I mean, why won't you do it on purpose?
If they're about to be dayvigged and their friends aren't around they would claim instantly, and what better to claim than doc? Besides, the maf might have already discussed the advantages/disadvantages of claiming doc in a tight situation. You're clearing his claim over speculation on games you haven't even participated/watched lmao this defence is dumb af surely you're better than that. The claim is null and irrelevant imo but his content is still atrocious and low effort.
Good Haruno case though is a saving grace I suppose.
Definitely not a snarky tl;dr of Champ's reads+explanations for them:
-Haruno is slightly townie for making an acceptable RVS vote.
-Zorbees is slightly townie because of some mystery posts that definitely exist I promise
-Earlio is slightly scummy for making an RVS vote which isn't acceptable and voting me for reasons I dislike.
-Jalmont is lurking but made a good post so is slightly scummy.
-BBM is quite townie except he plays like a scumlord (???????????????)
-Asek is slightly townie because all he's done is RVS (???) and plays like BBM who acts like a scumlord.
-No conclusion on Durza the main wagon.
The only one I think is a misrep there might be Earlio's because there's other stuff that could be scummy I guess (the Fenrir and Durza vote reasoning I suppose). He also didn't vote anyone.
unlynch Durza
lynch champ1604
Champ can you expand/explain some of these points more? Can you find Zorbees' posts (I believe there's a search function that lets you look at his posts individually) that you like because he is very unmemorable imo. Who would you like to lynch today? What do you think of BBM's case on Haruno?
The thing I had written about Haruno's RVS (RVS. Acceptable) was goddamn sarcasm if it wasn't obvious earlier before.
You're so awesome, I'm jealous. Purposely wrote only one line about zorbees, which was the mistake I had done in my read. It was around 2 AM when I was writing, and I had to wake up at 5 AM.
I think BBM and kirsche have summed up a lot of what I think about Fenrir, however, I will vote Earlio instead in the meantime. Last game, it was really obvious (in hindsight) that he was recruited, and obvious to me that he was town d1, so I'm putting pressure on someone who I think will be easy to read provided he posts more.
I think twin is town and Durza is more likely to be scum, but idk about Durza. I feel like, if he is being honest about why he asked Fenrir to claim, it is more likely that scum is thinking about what number majority is than town, so he may have honestly not realized. I do think a Durza/Fenrir team seems like it could make some sense.
Asek is acting similarly to last game when he was town, thats my only experience with him though.
Null reads on mostly everyone else.
And, do you read all points of mine or simply read one and then act like an 11 year old "OMG this read is bad I don't care what other posts they have used for the read I'm gonna say that this post is bad, this read is bad, they are bad OMG YEAH IM SO SMART"
The only acceptable question is of Jalmont. Yes, I agree that you may feel that I have SR'ed them for doing a good post and lurking. But that would mean that lurking isn't bad at all, right? Then I can lurk for the rest of the game with the guarantee that I won't be lynched, right?
Also, are you jealous that I TR'ed them?
And I goddamn said that BBM is a heavy tr for me. I have no idea what you mean by scumlord. And as far as me TR'ing them,
No comment on your Asek's tl;dr. WAIT, HOW CAN THIS BE EVEN CALLED A TL;DR???????????????????
Rejected tl;dr. These are questions, accusations and not a tl;dr.
And sorry for not concluding Durza, I was sleepy like hell, probably I forgot to do it.
But if couldn't be obvious, he's slightly scummy.
Remember that I had stated it earlier, that I refrained from using neutral. Otherwise many of them could be neutral. But nope, you need to act like an 11 year old.
) while avoiding the need to give us a reason a reason for why he picked those three. I don't care if y'all call me out for bandwagoning this guy has got to go. 
