OUPL III: IN CELEBRATION OF [1] SUCCESSFUL YEAR EDITION
The details are identical as last time, and are as follows:
On the tier lineups: njnp and I have been discussing this with various people already, and we've gathered a bunch of different opinions. At the end of the day, these four options seem to be the best because they pretty much all compromise various ideas people had while also having wider appeal than those ideas. We want the tour to be separate from (and not competing with) ROAPL, and we want more of an emphasis on SM. As a result of this, old gens are definitely being cut (at least RBY and GSC). On the other end of the spectrum, we didn't want to go with too many SM slots. Some people brought up having 5 slots or even FULL SM, but we agreed that while this would clearly emphasize SM and help to advance the meta somewhat, it makes the tour quite a bit more uninteresting, and it has the potential to limit players.
It'd be greatly appreciated if you could provide some reasoning in your manager signup post for the tier lineup you selected. Thank you!
The details are identical as last time, and are as follows:
- There will be 6 teams
- The slots for each team have not been finalized yet. We are going to be hearing input from the potential managers and OU insiders to decide which tier lineup is best. The choices are as follows:
- 1 DPP / 1 BW / 2 XY / 4 SM
- 1 DPP / 2 BW / 2 XY / 3 SM
- 2 BW / 2 XY / 4 SM
- 1 ADV / 1 DPP / 1 BW / 1 XY / 4 SM
- if you have another idea, feel free to mention it as well!
- The auction will be held on PS! and it will be a standard auction.
- Rosters must be submitted to us by the weekly deadline of Friday at 11:59 PM EST
- SPL inactivity rules will be applied
On the tier lineups: njnp and I have been discussing this with various people already, and we've gathered a bunch of different opinions. At the end of the day, these four options seem to be the best because they pretty much all compromise various ideas people had while also having wider appeal than those ideas. We want the tour to be separate from (and not competing with) ROAPL, and we want more of an emphasis on SM. As a result of this, old gens are definitely being cut (at least RBY and GSC). On the other end of the spectrum, we didn't want to go with too many SM slots. Some people brought up having 5 slots or even FULL SM, but we agreed that while this would clearly emphasize SM and help to advance the meta somewhat, it makes the tour quite a bit more uninteresting, and it has the potential to limit players.
It'd be greatly appreciated if you could provide some reasoning in your manager signup post for the tier lineup you selected. Thank you!
for example...Username:
Team name:
Availability:
Why would you make a good manager?:
Preferred tier setup:
pls name your teams after pokemon so we don't have to use shitty pictures in the matchups lmao.Username: starry blanket
Team name: Wonderful Wobbuffets
Availability: duh
Why would you make a good manager?: i'm LITERALLY the best
Preferred tier setup: secret
Last edited by a moderator: