The SV OU council is voting internally to determine if we will have a suspect this week or not act, waiting until mid-January to reassess. We are taking everything that had above a 3.0 on the tiering survey
here and voting.
This is precisely what I said to council. The vote is ongoing. I will keep you guys updated, but this is my best attempt at being transparent.
We are not going to suspect anything, but intend to put out another survey in the next week or two to gauge how the metagame is going, with the intent of being very open to a suspect then.
received votes from Star, Lily, TPP, ausma, and myself to be suspected, but only 5/11 is just short of getting the majority needed to be suspected. This was by far the closest vote though.
received votes from Star, Lily, and myself to be suspected, but only 3/11 is not enough to be suspected.
received a vote from TPP to be suspected, but only 1/11 is not enough to be suspected.
and
did not receive any votes to be suspected right now, but remain in our discussions and prominent in the metagam.
We intend to survey again in a couple of weeks, specifically following the first week of SPL and the start of OST, which are two of the biggest events in CG OU each year. There is some internal support to act on Kyurem (as the vote shows) and Gouging Fire in particular, but other Pokemon listed also are not entirely out of the woods either.
As for some new faces: Deoxys-Speed felt more pressing weeks ago than it did now. Part of being patient and waiting on things is being a bit more flexible than we previously have been post-release. This shift in approach, which is highlighted by a lot of what prominent players like
Vert and
Mimikyu Stardust outlined previously, allowed for us to adopt a metagame that is already plenty playable without cycling through prompt bans without getting full community input after some cycles of metagame evolution. The same goes for things like Raging Bolt, which was complained about as much as anything for a few days until things settld down a bit.
As for some prior Ubers: Darkrai was not on the top of our radar, but we will continue to discuss it. One council membr noted concerns about it -- the Hypnosis lead variant in particular, but it has yet to register as a top issue in the metagame. Roaring Moon is a far more commonly noted problem and it did get some support to suspect it, but it is not seen as pressing with people adopting a few different methods of counterplay that did not previously find themselves onto teams.
As for some old friends: Gholdengo is a very controversial topic and while it seems ill-advised to rush a suspect on it when it has less survey support than any point across the last six months, we are listening to discussion on it and intned to keep it on surveys. I personally supported suspecting it at the end of DLC1 and am personally going to promise we keep a close eye on it moving forward. The same goes for Kingambit, too. It makes no sense to suspect either Pokemon when they have results around a 3.0 and there are Pokemon we view as bigger targets while they are still growing into their full place in this developing metagame, but that does not mean we are ignoring them and this does mean more discussions are to come.